Online Safety for ALN & Neurodivergent Young People | Learn Without Limits CIC
This article forms part of Learn Without Limits CIC’s participation in Safer Internet Day 2026, supporting families of disabled, chronically ill, neurodivergent, and home-educated children. Generic online safety advice does not adequately protect disabled, neurodivergent, or chronically unwell children because it does not reflect how they actually access the internet, education, or social spaces, we attempt to address the most common gaps below.
Why this matters
Chronically unwell, neurodivergent and disabled teens often rely on online spaces more than their peers. For many ALN home learners, the internet is where:
education takes place
friendships are maintained
independence is explored
isolation caused by illness, fatigue or exclusion is reduced
At the same time, these young people are more likely to depend on assistive technology such as screen readers, AAC, voice dictation, captions, smart assistants and AI tools.
These tools are essential. They are also rarely considered properly in mainstream safeguarding guidance.
Most online safety systems were designed for children who are:
neurotypical
sighted
typing rather than speaking
attending school daily
supervised through formal institutions
That is not the reality for many ALN and home educated children.
Understanding vulnerability without underestimating your child
Being vulnerable online does not mean being careless, immature or incapable.
Chronically unwell and ND teens may:
spend long periods online due to pain, fatigue or limited mobility
be awake and online at night when symptoms flare
rely on voice, text to speech or AAC rather than typing
struggle with social nuance, persuasion or hidden intent
interpret language very literally, including AI generated responses
seek connection during isolation or low mood
Safeguarding must be built around how a child actually lives and communicates, not how guidance assumes they do.
A critical reality check for elective home education families
In elective home education spaces, both online and offline, there is no formal regulation.
This includes:
home education groups
social meet ups
learning pods
clubs and activities
online group chats and forums
There is no requirement for:
DBS checks
safeguarding training
vetting of adults running groups
identity verification in online spaces
Parents often assume that because a group is described as educational, supportive or community based, it is inherently safe. That assumption can be dangerous.
It is important for parents to understand a well documented safeguarding pattern:
Many predators gain access to children by first gaining the trust of adult carers.
This may look like:
appearing helpful, knowledgeable or generous
offering support to overwhelmed parents
positioning themselves as experienced in SEN, trauma or behaviour
volunteering to run activities, clubs or online spaces
slowly normalising private communication with children
This is not about suspicion or panic. It is about recognising that trust must be built carefully and reviewed regularly, especially in unregulated spaces.
Assistive technology and safeguarding gaps
Screen readers and text to speech
The risk
Screen readers and text to speech tools read everything aloud once content loads. This means:
sexual, violent or extremist content may be spoken before a parent can intervene
preview text, comments and adverts may be read aloud even if links are blocked
abusive or explicit messages can be broadcast unintentionally
For some ND teens, auditory exposure can be more intense and harder to disengage from than visual exposure.
Why filters often fail
Most parental controls filter web pages, not spoken output. Accessibility narration operates outside standard filtering systems.
What helps
child specific device profiles
disabling auto read or auto play where possible
practising pause and stop speech commands together
sitting with your child when introducing new platforms
AAC and communication apps
The risk
AAC tools may:
store message history in the cloud
sync across devices linked to adult accounts
expose deeply personal thoughts if accessed by others
make a child’s communication style visible, increasing targeting risk
AAC users are also sometimes perceived as cognitively younger, which can increase vulnerability.
What helps
check where data is stored and who controls the account
avoid linking AAC tools to social media or shared emails
use device level locks even within trusted apps
role play what to do if someone asks for private information
Speech to text and dictation
The risk
background conversations may be captured unintentionally
sensitive medical or family information may be transcribed
drafts may auto save to cloud services
mis transcription can result in messages being sent accidentally
Chronically unwell teens often dictate when fatigued, which increases the likelihood of errors.
What helps
turn off auto send and auto save
review before sending as a fixed habit
dictate in quiet, supervised spaces
disable microphones when not actively in use
Voice assistants and smart speakers
The risk
Most generic parental controls, including Google SafeSearch and ISP level filters, do not reliably apply to voice activated searches.
Voice assistants:
bypass visual safeguards
provide summarised spoken answers without context
leave no visible search trail
allow private exploration of risky topics
For ND teens who prefer voice access, this can become an unsupervised route online.
What helps
restrict assistants to music, timers and weather
disable web search, messaging and purchasing
keep smart speakers out of bedrooms
review voice histories together calmly
Captions and auto translation
The risk
Auto captions and translations can:
distort tone and intent
remove safeguarding cues
normalise harmful language
misrepresent discussions of abuse or self harm
ND learners who rely on captions may miss warning signs that others hear.
What helps
watch new content together initially
discuss tone and subtext
favour moderated platforms for younger teens
AI tools and emotional risk
AI tools can support learning, organisation and communication. They can also:
reflect harmful ideas without challenge
feel emotionally validating in ways that replace human support
blur boundaries between tool and relationship
give unsafe health or mental health advice
When AI output is read aloud using assistive technology, emotional impact can increase.
Safeguarding approach
frame AI clearly as a tool, not a friend
keep use task based and time limited
no AI chats overnight or in bedrooms
regularly ask what the AI helped with today
Gaming safety insert for ALN children and teens
Online games are not just games. They are social spaces, chat platforms and communities with minimal identity verification.
A recurring safeguarding risk reported by parents and taken seriously by police is adults pretending to be children in online games and groups. This has occurred on platforms including Roblox, as well as in supposedly moderated group chats.
In some cases, the adult:
builds trust over time
encourages secrecy
moves conversations into private chat
introduces sexualised or coercive behaviour
attempts to arrange an in person meeting
Why this works
This risk does not rely on children being reckless. It relies on:
children trusting child labelled spaces
avatars, role play and private chat
moderation that is reactive rather than preventative
isolation or loneliness
parents assuming moderation equals vetting
Gaming rules that genuinely protect children
No private chat with unknown people
Children should not private message or voice chat with anyone unless parents know the other child’s parents.
Shared space gaming
Gaming should take place in living areas, not bedrooms. Adult presence disrupts grooming behaviour.
Voice chat boundaries
No voice chat late at night. No voice chat with unknown players. Headsets only when adults are nearby.
Closed groups are safest
The lowest risk setup is closed groups where:
every child is known
parents have each other’s contact details
at least one adult actively moderates
Delaying smartphones is protective
Many families choose basic phones for emergencies and delay smartphones until mid to late teens. This is a safeguarding decision, not a social failure.
What children should be taught clearly
Some adults pretend to be kids online
Anyone asking for secrets is a warning sign
If someone suggests meeting up, tell an adult immediately
You will never be in trouble for telling
Red flags parents should take seriously
pressure to keep secrets
requests to move chats to other platforms
sudden emotional attachment to an online friend
secrecy around gaming or devices
mention of meeting in person
gifts or in game currency being offered
Trust your instincts. If something feels wrong, it usually is.
If something goes wrong
You do not need certainty to act.
Immediate danger, call 999
Online grooming or exploitation, report to CEOP
https://www.ceop.police.uk/Safety-Centre/Non emergency concerns, call 101
Report within the platform and keep evidence
Parents can report on behalf of their child. Early reporting helps protect other children too.
Non negotiable protections that matter
No screens in bedrooms
Devices used in shared spaces
Layered technical controls combined with adult supervision
Open conversations without fear or punishment
No filter replaces an informed, present adult.
Safer Internet Day 2026
Learn Without Limits CIC is participating in Safer Internet Day 2026 on 12th February 2026. We will be running an online Zoom workshop for parents focusing on online safety, disability, assistive technology, and safeguarding in home education spaces.
Details on how to join our event will be published on our website:
https://learnwithoutlimitscic.org
Safeguarding disclaimer
This article is provided for general information and parental support only. It does not replace professional safeguarding advice, police guidance or statutory intervention.
Learn Without Limits CIC does not investigate safeguarding concerns and cannot act as a reporting body. If you believe a child is at risk:
contact emergency services immediately if there is danger
report concerns to CEOP or the police
follow local safeguarding procedures
We encourage early reporting, calm action and support for children without blame.
Final reassurance for parents
Elective home education and disability spaces rely heavily on trust. Trust must be built slowly, reviewed regularly and never assumed.
Good safeguarding is:
calm
proportionate
realistic
responsive to how your child actually lives and communicates
If this article feels long, it is because families of disabled and chronically unwell children are rarely given the full picture.
Presence, boundaries and early reporting protect far more effectively than fear.
Sources and further reading
UK Safer Internet Centre
https://www.saferinternet.org.ukSafer Internet Day 2026
https://saferinternet.org.uk/safer-internet-day/safer-internet-day-2026CEOP Safety Centre
https://www.ceop.police.uk/Safety-Centre/NSPCC, online safety for children with additional needs
https://www.nspcc.org.uk/keeping-children-safe/online-safety/Ofcom, children’s media use
https://www.ofcom.org.ukOffice of the Children’s Commissioner
https://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This Blog is an official publication of Learn without Limits CIC
No comments:
Post a Comment