IDP Series: Private Diagnoses and the IDP Process in Wales

 

Private Diagnoses and the IDP Process in Wales:




What the ALN Code REALLY Says (and How to Use Private Reports Effectively)**

Families across Wales often turn to private assessments because NHS waiting lists are long, inconsistent or inaccessible. Yet many parents are told:

  • “We don’t accept private reports.”

  • “Only NHS diagnoses count.”

  • CAMHS must confirm it.”

  • Private EP reports aren’t valid.”

None of these statements are correct under the ALN Act or the Additional Learning Needs Code (Wales) 2021.

This article explains — calmly, clearly, and legally — how private reports should be used in the IDP process.


1. Are Private Diagnoses Valid for IDPs?

Yes. 100% yes. They are legally valid and must be considered.

The ALN Code states:

“Identifying whether a child… has ALN requires evidence…
This evidence might come from… other services…
It might also come from the child, their parents or the young person themselves.”

(Cod ADY 20.2)
“This evidence may also include specialist services.”
(Cod ADY 20.3)

This includes private:

✔ Schools/LAs must consider private evidence.

✔ There is no legal distinction between private and NHS evidence.


2. Schools Cannot Reject Private Reports

Schools must base decisions on all evidence presented.

The ALN Code requires:

“…using the evidence available…”
(ALN Code 20.19)

and

“…seeking advice from appropriate specialist services when needed.”
(ALN Code 20.20)

This creates a legal obligation to:

✔ Consider private EP assessments
✔ Consider private ASD/ADHD reports
✔ Consider private sensory/OT/SALT reports
✔ Consider independent medical evidence

A school cannot lawfully say:

❌ “We don’t accept private reports.”
❌ “Only CAMHS can diagnose ASD.”
❌ “This doesn’t count unless NHS confirms it.”

They may disagree with parts of a report — but they must:

  • record the evidence, and

  • provide justification if they take a different view.

They cannot ignore it.


3. Local Authorities Cannot Ignore Private Reports Either

Local Authorities must consider:

  • all relevant evidence (20.2, 20.3)

  • all parental evidence (20.2)

  • all specialist evidence (20.3, 20.20)

If the LA feels more assessment is required, they must seek it, not dismiss what exists.

This may include:

But private evidence still forms part of the legal evidence base.


4. What If a Private Diagnosis Conflicts with NHS Opinion?

Contradictions happen.
Private ASD: NHS says “not ASD”.
NHS says “anxiety”: private EP identifies ASD/ADHD traits.
One SALT says “no need”: private SALT says “significant delay”.

The ALN Code expects:

  • consideration of all evidence (20.19)

  • seeking clarification from appropriate specialists (20.20)

  • decisions based on functional need, not labels

✔ The IDP is based on need, not diagnosis.

Even if professionals disagree, functional needs remain:

The IDP must reflect what the child needs, regardless of diagnostic debate.


5. How Private Reports Influence the IDP

Private assessments are often more detailed than school or NHS reports.

They improve:

A. Needs Section

B. Outcomes

Private reports help create SMART outcomes:

  • Specific

  • Measurable

  • Achievable

  • Realistic

  • Timely

C. ALP (Additional Learning Provision)

Often provides concrete, quantifiable recommendations:

✔ “3× weekly 40-minute specialist literacy sessions”
✔ “Daily sensory diet delivered 3× day”
✔ “Visual timetable used consistently”
✔ “AAC device used for all transitions”
✔ “Seating and postural plan to be followed”

D. Placement Decisions

Private reports can show:

  • sensory overload

  • inability to regulate in mainstream

  • severe attendance barriers

  • medical needs

  • trauma impact

This evidence supports decisions about:

  • LA-maintained IDPs

  • specialist placement

  • EOTAS

  • adjustments in school


6. How to Submit a Private Report (Parent Script)

ENGLISH:
“I would like this private assessment to be recorded as evidence under ALN Code 20.2 and 20.3.
Please confirm in writing that it will be considered in the IDP review.”

CYMRAEG:
“Hoffwn i’r asesiad preifat hwn gael ei gofnodi fel tystiolaeth o dan God ADY 20.2 a 20.3.
A allech gadarnhau yn ysgrifenedig y bydd yn cael ei ystyried yn yr adolygiad CTP?”

If they resist:

“The ALN Code requires decisions to consider all relevant evidence (20.19).
Can you put your position in writing?”

Very few will do so — because they know they can’t legally refuse it.


7. Myths vs Truths

❌ “We only accept NHS diagnoses.”

✔ The Code requires all relevant evidence (20.2, 20.3, 20.19).

❌ “Private EP reports aren’t valid.”

✔ EP advice is specialist advice (20.20) → must be considered.

❌ “We need CAMHS to agree first.”

✔ CAMHS is not the decision-maker for IDPs (schools/LAs are).

❌ “We’ll wait for NHS assessment first.”

✔ The IDP must reflect current needs, not planned future assessments.


8. When Private Reports Trigger an LA-Maintained IDP

Sometimes private assessments reveal needs that schools cannot reasonably meet.

Examples:

  • complex sensory needs

  • EBSA linked to severe distress

  • trauma

  • physical disability requiring equipment

  • significant dyslexia requiring specialist ALP

  • multi-agency involvement

  • chronic illness impacting stamina

  • substantial mental health needs

The relevant Code section is:

ALN Code 23.67

If the ALP required cannot be delivered in full at any maintained school, the LA must take over responsibility.

This is the legally correct citation.


9. When a Private Report Justifies an Early Review

Parents may request a review at any time.

The correct citation is:

ALN Code 25.21

Parents can request a review, and the school/LA must conduct it unless unnecessary.

Parent script:
“I request an early review of the IDP under ALN Code 25.21 due to new evidence.”


10. Summary: What Private Reports Mean for the IDP

✔ They are legally valid
✔ They must be considered
✔ Schools cannot reject them
✔ LAs cannot ignore them
✔ They influence needs, outcomes, ALP and placement
✔ They help clarify complex profiles
✔ They often support LA-maintained IDPs
✔ They strengthen requests for EOTAS when appropriate
✔ They help ensure the child’s real needs are captured

Private assessments do not replace NHS involvement — they complement it and give a fuller picture of the child.

=====================================================================


This article provides general information about the ALN Act and ALN Code in Wales.
It is not legal advice. For individual cases, families may wish to seek independent specialist advice if needed.

IDP Series: When an IDP Should Move From the School to the Local Authority

 

When an IDP Should Move From the School to the Local Authority





A Clear Explanation of the ALN Code for Families in Wales

One of the most misunderstood areas of Wales’ ALN system is who should maintain the IDP — the school or the Local Authority (LA).

Families are often left unsure when escalation should happen, why it matters, and how the Code expects decisions to be made.

This article explains, in clear terms:

  • what the ALN Act and ALN Code say

  • the three legal triggers for LA involvement

  • how this applies to EOTAS and Electively Home Educated (EHE) children

  • why schools sometimes hesitate

  • what families can do when needs exceed school capacity

This is general information about the ALN system, not legal advice.


1. What the ALN Code Says About When the LA Must Take Over

The key guidance is in ALN Code 23.63–23.67.

ALN Code 23.63

If a school is not able to secure the ALP, it must notify the LA.

ALN Code 23.64

The school must set out the reasons why an LA-maintained IDP may be needed.

ALN Code 23.65

The LA then considers whether it will take over maintenance of the IDP.

ALN Code 23.67

The LA must maintain the IDP where:

  • the child’s needs are more complex,

  • provision required goes beyond what a school can reasonably secure, or

  • the child is EOTAS (educated otherwise than at school).

These sections form the legal basis for escalation.


2. The Three Clear Triggers for LA-Maintained IDPs

Families often find it helpful to think about three broad triggers the Code describes.


Trigger 1: Needs the School Cannot Reasonably Secure

Some needs go beyond what mainstream settings can provide.
Examples include:

  • specialist therapeutic programmes (SALT, OT, Physio)

  • multi-agency ALP requiring coordinated oversight

  • complex medical or sensory needs

  • specialist literacy/numeracy programmes

  • support requiring regular review by external professionals

  • ALP requiring costs or staffing beyond delegated budgets

  • needs requiring outreach tutors or alternative provision

Where needs exceed the school’s capacity, the Code is clear that the LA becomes responsible for the IDP.


Trigger 2: The Child Is Unable to Attend School Because of ALN

This includes children who are:

  • too anxious or dysregulated to attend

  • out of school due to unmet needs

  • on reduced hours

  • excluded

  • recovering from medical issues

  • awaiting a new placement

  • in a managed move that is breaking down

In these situations, the LA is responsible for securing suitable ALP and education.
This usually means the IDP becomes LA-maintained.


Trigger 3: The Child Is EOTAS (Educated Other Than at School)

For EOTAS learners:

  • the IDP is always LA-maintained

  • schools cannot legally maintain IDPs for EOTAS pupils

  • the LA is responsible for the ALP and educational package

This is automatic and does not depend on school opinion.


3. Electively Home Educated (EHE) Children and IDPs

Where a child is EHE and has ALN, parents may request an assessment.
If an IDP is created:

  • it must always be LA-maintained

  • the parent delivers the educational element (as required by EHE law)

  • specialist ALP (therapy, assessments, sensory plans, equipment, home adaptations) remains the responsibility of NHS or Social Care

Parents may carry out day-to-day therapy activities at home,
but programmes must still be professionally designed, reviewed and overseen.

The LA should not shift specialist NHS or Social Care responsibilities onto parents.


4. Why Escalation Can Be Difficult for Schools (Without Blaming Staff)

Families often see hesitation from schools, and this is usually due to system pressures, such as:

  • uncertainty about the Code

  • heavy workloads

  • worry about appearing to “fail” the child

  • fear of damaging LA relationships

  • wanting to try all internal strategies first

  • unclear internal processes

  • staffing or budget constraints

These pressures are real.
But they do not change the requirements of the ALN Act or ALN Code.


5. Families Can Request That the LA Consider Taking Over

The Code allows families to ask the LA to consider whether it should maintain the IDP.

Many families find wording like this helpful:

“We would be grateful if the Local Authority could consider maintaining the IDP under ALN Code 23.63–23.67, as aspects of the ALP appear to exceed what the school can reasonably secure.”

This is polite, factual and firmly grounded in the Code.

It avoids conflict while clearly signalling that escalation should be considered.


6. Information Families Often Provide to Support Escalation

Families sometimes choose to share:

  • professional reports

  • evidence of unmet ALP

  • attendance or anxiety patterns

  • sensory/medical information

  • dysregulation logs

  • details of reduced timetables

  • exclusion or managed-move correspondence

  • child voice statements

  • written examples of what is not working

This gives the LA a clearer picture when deciding who should maintain the IDP.


7. What Happens If the LA Takes Over?

When the LA maintains the IDP, it generally:

  • assigns an LA ALN Officer

  • gathers updated information

  • consults health and social care

  • reviews outcomes and ALP

  • considers EOTAS or alternative provision where relevant

  • coordinates multi-agency planning

  • rewrites or updates the IDP

  • sets the schedule for formal reviews

If the child is still on roll, the ALNCo remains involved as the school link professional.


8. If the LA Decides Not to Maintain the IDP

If the LA decides the IDP can remain school-based, families may choose to:

  • request another review

  • submit additional information

  • ask for multi-agency involvement

  • use the LA’s complaints procedure

  • use disagreement resolution

The best next step varies depending on the child’s situation.


9. Summary

An IDP may need to move to the LA when:

✔ the school cannot reasonably secure the ALP
✔ the child is out of school due to ALN
✔ the child is EOTAS
✔ the child is EHE and requires ALP

The ALN Code provides a clear framework for these decisions.
Families and schools both play important parts in identifying when escalation should be considered.


Endnote 

This article provides general information about the ALN system and the ALN Code in Wales.
It is not legal advice. Families may wish to seek independent specialist advice for individual cases.




IDP Series: What Makes a Good IDP Review?

 

What Makes a Good IDP Review?



A Parent Guide to Your Rights, the Process, and What Must Happen in Wales

IDP reviews are the engine of the Welsh ALN system.
Done well, they help children progress, ensure needs are understood, and support parents and professionals to work together openly and honestly.

Done poorly, reviews become rushed, tokenistic, and leave children without the support they are legally entitled to.

This article explains:

  • what the ALN Code and ALN Act require

  • what must happen in a review

  • the role of the ALNCo, NHS therapists, school nurses and the LA

  • how children’s voices must be gathered

  • the importance of collaborative, creative problem-solving

  • red flags to look out for

  • what to do when things break down


1. Legal Duties Under the ALN Act and Code

A) Parents can request a review at ANY time

ALN Code 25.21 gives parents an unrestricted right to request an IDP review.
The school or LA must carry out the review unless it is “unnecessary”.


B) Reviews must be person-centred

The process must adapt to the child, & not the other way around.


C) Reviews must check whether ALP is being delivered

Additional Learning Provision (ALP) means:

The extra support a child needs to learn, which is additional to or different from what is normally available to all pupils.

This includes:

  • educational provision

  • health-related provision

  • social-care-related provision that affects learning

The review must examine whether ALP is:

  • being delivered

  • effective

  • still needed

  • needing to be changed or increased

  • beyond the school’s capacity (which triggers LA takeover: ALN Code 23.67)


D) Reviews must be multi-agency when needed

Health and social care must contribute when their input affects learning.


2. What MUST Happen in an IDP Review (Checklist)

✔ full discussion of needs (educational, medical, sensory, social care)
✔ updated child voice
✔ parent views
✔ full review of all ALP
✔ review and rewriting of outcomes
SMART outcomes
✔ review of new evidence
✔ assessment of whether the school can still maintain the plan
✔ written record including disagreements


3. The Roles of the ALNCo, NHS Therapists and School Nurses

This is often where the quality of an IDP review is won or lost.


A) The ALNCo – Coordinator and Quality Safeguard

The ALNCo:

  • coordinates the IDP process

  • gathers evidence

  • ensures person-centred practice

  • checks delivery of ALP

  • writes and updates outcomes

  • liaises with therapists and social care

  • escalates to the LA when needed (ALN Code 23.67)

A strong ALNCo is open, honest and collaborative.
An overstretched ALNCo may struggle, usually due to system pressures, not unwillingness.


B) NHS Therapists (SALT, OT, Physio, CAMHS etc.)

Under ALN Act s.20 and ALN Code 21.6, NHS therapists must provide advice when schools or LAs request it.

They must provide:

  • assessment findings

  • therapy programmes

  • sensory plans

  • positioning/feeding/handling plans

  • communication advice

  • risk assessments

  • medical or mental health guidance

They do not have to offer direct therapy unless the LA formally delegates health ALP under s.18–19 ALN Act.
But they must offer written advice.


C) School Nurses – The Most Underrated IDP Contributors

School nurses bring essential expertise that is often overlooked:

  • epilepsy

  • diabetes

  • asthma

  • continence

  • feeding/choking

  • chronic illness and fatigue

  • mental health

  • trauma-informed care

  • emergency plans

  • equipment and risk advice

As part of “health bodies,” they fall under the same duty to provide advice (ALN Act s.20; ALN Code 21.6).

They can, and should, contribute to IDPs far more often.


4.  The Role of the Local Authority (LA) ALN Officer — Who Leads When?

This is where parents are often confused, because responsibility shifts depending on the situation.

Below is the simple, legally accurate explanation.


A) When the IDP is school-maintained

  • The ALNCo leads.

  • The LA ALN Officer is available for advice but is not the plan owner.


B) When the IDP becomes LA-maintained

This happens when:

  • the child has complex needs, or

  • ALP cannot be delivered by the school (ALN Code 23.67), or

  • the child is EOTAS, or

  • the child is EHE, or

  • the child is out of school for any reason

In an LA-maintained IDP:

✔ The LA becomes the responsible body

✔ The LA ALN Officer becomes the lead professional

✔ The ALNCo becomes the school link professional, if the child is still on roll

The ALNCo does not disappear unless the child leaves the school roll.

The LA:

  • writes and updates the IDP

  • gathers evidence

  • coordinates multi-agency input

  • ensures ALP is secured

  • leads all reviews

The ALNCo:

  • provides school observations and evidence

  • supports day-to-day delivery of ALP (if still on roll)

  • attends meetings

  • ensures school provision aligns with the IDP


C) EOTAS Children

  • If still on roll → ALNCo contributes

  • If off roll → ALNCo has no role

  • LA ALN Officer is the lead in both cases


D) EHE Children

  • The IDP must always be LA-maintained

  • The ALNCo has no role

  • The parent becomes the education representative

  • The LA ALN Officer leads and coordinates all ALP


E) Quick Summary Table

SituationMaintains IDPALNCo RoleLA Officer Role
School-based IDPSchoolLeadAdvisory
LA IDP (complex needs)LASchool linkLead
EOTAS (on roll)LAContributeLead
EOTAS (off roll)LANoneLead
EHELANoneLead
Awaiting placementLAContributeLead

5. The Best IDP Reviews Are Collaborative, Creative, and Transparent

A high-quality review is not a tick-box exercise.
It should feel like a team problem-solving meeting, centred on the child.

The best reviews are:

  • honest about what is and isn’t working

  • transparent about limitations

  • open to new strategies

  • creative in problem-solving

  • collaborative

  • child-centred

  • flexible

  • solution-focused

  • guided by the question:
    “What can we try next to help this child progress?”

This is where the ALNCo, the LA ALN Officer, nurses, therapists, teachers, parents and the child should all contribute equally.


6. Supporting Your Child’s Voice — Legally and Practically

Child voice must be gathered in whatever format suits them, not the adults.

This may include:

  • drawings

  • videos

  • audio recordings

  • AAC

  • BSL

  • written notes

  • parent scribing

  • a trusted adult gathering views privately

  • pre-meeting activities for anxious or PDA-profile children

Attendance is optional.
Participation is required, creatively and accessibly.


7. Red Flags of a Poor or Unlawful Review

🚩 “We only do annual reviews.”
🚩 “Health hasn’t replied, so it can’t go in the IDP.”
🚩 Review under 20 minutes.
🚩 No discussion of ALP delivery.
🚩 Outcomes never change.
🚩 No child voice captured.
🚩 School refuses escalation.
🚩 Parent disagreement not recorded.

Any of these = not legally compliant.


8. What To Do If the Review Is Flawed

✔ Email corrections immediately
✔ Request a new review (ALN Code 25.21)
✔ Ask for escalation to the LA
✔ Request missing specialist input
✔ Submit your own written statement
✔ Document unmet ALP
✔ Ask for suitable methods for child voice
✔ Use dispute resolution if needed


9. Parent Scripts 

Refusing a review:
“I am requesting a review under ALN Code 25.21. Please confirm the date.”

Child voice missing:
“Could we gather my child’s views using drawings/video/AAC before the next meeting?”

ALP not delivered:
“Can we record what ALP isn’t happening so the IDP can be updated?”

Medical needs dismissed:
“ALN Code 23.55–23.63 requires health-related needs to be included. Can we add this?”


10. Summary

A good IDP review is:

✔ person-centred
✔ creative
✔ collaborative
✔ honest
✔ multi-agency
✔ SMART-focused
✔ transparent
✔ flexible
✔ solution-oriented

A poor review is:

✘ rushed
✘ vague
✘ adult-led
✘ tick-box
✘ defensive
✘ non-transparent

Strong reviews help children progress.
Weak reviews leave them stuck.

========================================================================



This article provides general information about the ALN Act and ALN Code in Wales.
It is not legal advice. For individual cases, families may wish to seek independent specialist advice if needed.

IDP Series, Health & Social Care

 

 IDP Series, Health & Social Care: What Must Be Included, What Local Health Boards Owe Your Child, and What to Do When They Refuse 



Health and social care support are two of the most inconsistently applied parts of the ALN system in Wales — yet the legal duties are extremely clear.

This article explains what MUST go into an IDP, based on the Additional Learning Needs and Education Tribunal (Wales) Act 2018 (ALN Act), the ALN Code for Wales (statutory), and the Social Services and Well-Being (Wales) Act 2014 (SSWBA).


1. The Law: Health and Social Care MUST Contribute to IDPs

A. Duties Under the ALN Act (2018)

Health advice (ALN Act 2018, s.20)
A Local Health Board must provide the local authority or school with whatever advice and information they reasonably require to support an IDP.

Health-related ALP (ALN Act 2018, s.18–19)
If a Health Board agrees that something is health-related Additional Learning Provision, then they must secure that provision. This is a binding statutory duty.

Multi-agency working (ALN Act 2018, s.77)
Local authorities, Health Boards and social services must cooperate with each other in supporting children with ALN.


B. Duties Under the ALN Code (Statutory Code 2021)

Evidence must be considered (ALN Code 20.2)
Evidence may come from other services, the child, or the child’s parents.

Evidence can include specialist services (ALN Code 20.3)
This includes NHS and private specialists (EP, SALT, OT, physio, CAMHS, paediatrics, audiology etc.).

Schools/LAs must seek specialist advice (ALN Code 20.20)
Authorities must request advice from appropriate specialist services where needed.

Health must provide advice (ALN Code 21.6)
Health Boards must respond to requests for advice and information.

Social care must contribute (ALN Code 21.10)
Local authorities must ensure social services provide advice and information to support IDP development.

Health ALP in the IDP (ALN Code 23.55–23.63)
Medical, sensory and therapeutic needs and provision must be recorded in the IDP.

When the LA must take over (ALN Code 23.67)
If the ALP required cannot be delivered in full at any maintained school, the LA must take responsibility for the IDP.

Right to request a review (ALN Code 25.21)
Parents may request an IDP review at any time, and the school or LA must arrange it unless unnecessary.


C. Duties Under the Social Services & Well-Being (Wales) Act 2014

Disability duty to assess (SSWBA 2014, s.21(5))
If a child may need care and support, the local authority must assess them.

Rights regardless of education setting
Disabled children retain their rights to social care even if they are:
• in school
EOTAS
EHE
• not in education at all

Social care support must appear in the IDP
Any disability-related need that affects learning must be recorded in the IDP, including home adaptations, equipment, handling plans, PAs, short breaks, or safeguarding involvement.


2. What Health MUST Provide for an IDP

Based on the ALN Act s.20 and ALN Code 21.6, health bodies must provide:

• written advice
• medical information
care plans
therapy recommendations
sensory profiles
positioning/handling plans
risk assessments
feeding/ swallowing guidance
fatigue and pacing strategies

This is required even if:
• the child is not on a waiting list
• the service has “no capacity”
• the child is on a diagnostic pathway
• the child is EHE or EOTAS
• the child has been discharged


3. What MUST Appear in the IDP (Health Section)

Under ALN Code 23.55–23.63, the IDP must include:

• medical diagnoses
• sensory and motor needs
therapy guidance
physical disability requirements
• mental health needs
• safety plans
• seizure plans
• feeding/swallowing risks
• fatigue and pain
• specialist equipment
• personal care needs

These must be written in even if NHS staff do not supply full recommendations.


4. What Social Care MUST Provide

Under ALN Code 21.10 and SSWBA 2014, social care must provide advice and support where a child’s disability or home situation impacts learning.

This may include:

• disability assessments
• home adaptations
• equipment
• manual handling plans
• PA support
• short breaks
• risk management
• safeguarding advice
• support for family wellbeing

These must appear in the IDP whenever they affect access to learning.


5. Multi-Agency Examples

Autism / Sensory / Communication (SALT, OT, CAMHS)

• sensory diet
• AAC
• anxiety plan
• joint attention work
• environment adjustments

Physical Disability (Physio, OT, Social Care)

• equipment
• handling and seating plans
• mobility support
• PA or two-person transfers

Chronic Illness (Nursing, Paediatrics)

• glucose monitoring
• seizure plan
• pacing
• medical access
• risk plans

Mental Health (CAMHS / community services)

• safety and anxiety plans
• graduated engagement
• trauma-informed approaches


6. What If Health Will Not Engage?

If health refuses, delays, or says “lack of capacity,” parents can use this wording:

“ALN Act s.20 and ALN Code 21.6 require the Health Board to provide advice when requested.
Could you confirm in writing whether this advice will be provided?”

The IDP must still record:

• the need
• the provision required
• that health advice is pending

The ALN system cannot leave gaps because a service did not reply.

Parents can escalate through:
• ALN Lead Officer
• Health Board complaints
Welsh Ombudsman
• their MS
• safeguarding if relevant


7. When Health Needs Trigger an LA-Maintained IDP

Under ALN Code 23.67, if the required ALP:

• involves daily therapy programmes
• requires medical oversight
• involves multi-agency input
• needs specialist equipment or training
• is beyond school staff expertise
• poses significant risk
• cannot be delivered consistently in school

…the Local Authority must take over the IDP.

Schools cannot legally continue to maintain an IDP they cannot deliver.


8. Parent Scripts (Legally Grounded)

When school tries to remove health needs:
“ALN Code 23.55–23.63 requires health-related needs and ALP to be included in the IDP. Could we ensure this is recorded?”

When health claims ‘no capacity’:
“Under ALN Act s.20 and ALN Code 21.6, the Health Board must provide advice when requested. Could you confirm in writing whether advice will be provided?”

When requesting a review:
“I am requesting a review under ALN Code 25.21 due to new evidence or changes in need.”


Summary

✔ Health must provide advice (ALN Act s.20; ALN Code 21.6)
✔ Social care must contribute where relevant (ALN Code 21.10)
✔ Needs must be written into the IDP even if services do not engage
✔ Health ALP must be included (ALN Code 23.55–23.63)
✔ LA must take over the IDP when ALP is beyond school capacity (ALN Code 23.67)
✔ Parents can request a review at any time (ALN Code 25.21)
✔ The Social Services & Well-Being Act guarantees disability support regardless of school attendance
✔ All multi-agency needs must be recorded clearly in the IDP

Health and social care are not optional extras in IDPs — they are essential components backed by binding statutory duties.

=======================================================================



This article provides general information about the ALN Act and ALN Code in Wales.
It is not legal advice. For individual cases, families may wish to seek independent specialist advice if needed.